41 replies to this topic

[Tretnine]

I know I've made this suggestion before, but I really think that wildfire could use a regular maps server. I also realize that we could use one of the us/uk 4 servers if we want to play regular maps, but they're marked private to everyone who finds them via steam, and they're never used. Right now, I don't have a good server to play regular cs on. I would like this idea to at least see the light of day, and to give people a chance to give feedback on the idea of a regular maps server. At the very least, I think we could switch over the name of US4 to public, and we could still close it off if we need to use it for private matches/tryouts. To me, at least, it would be of better use if it were actually being used.

Please, hear this idea out and don't just instantly close the thread, I like regular maps just as much as BF, and I think it'd be good to know if the rest of the clan feels the same way.

[CSA-DOLIMAIN]

I second that it at least be Discussed.

[Crosshair]

CSA-DOLIMAIN, on Jun 3 2007, 01:11 PM, said:

I second that it at least be Discussed.

Third

[Laminate]

There's no reason we shouldn't be able to have a server that uses regular maps

[Waffle Factor]

I suggest changing UK2 to regular map cycle. Especially since it will condense the breakfloor population into UK1, so it will be a more full server usually.

[Tretnine]

Waffle Factor, on Jun 3 2007, 01:22 PM, said:

I suggest changing UK2 to regular map cycle. Especially since it will condense the breakfloor population into UK1, so it will be a more full server usually.

I would support this for US2 or US4 as well. I think the same logic could be applied to the US servers, which are used, but never entirely full.

[Coverfire]

I like the idea but me likey US 2

[TheJakko?]

Yeah i would love a regular maps server.
Iv'e made a topic about it once, nothing happend.
Well i think this suggestion should go ahead, it's good idear. You have my vote.

[Darkcoder]

I too agree, the US/UK? 4 servers are empty 90% of the time, the only time they are used is during scrims which isn't very often, during the time they aren't running scrims they should be public and have a normal server rotation, you could always have the server name change from public to private with the new server system that's being made or something.

[Achilles]

CSA-DOLIMAIN, on Jun 3 2007, 01:11 PM, said:

I second that it at least be Discussed.

Crosshair, on Jun 3 2007, 01:15 PM, said:

Third

fourth that

[Laminate]

Host it and they will come..

[must_know_my_abcd]

Crosshair, on Jun 3 2007, 06:15 PM, said:

Third

fourth

[Tretnine]

fifth?? ^^

[Waffle Factor]

Don't turn this into spam, actually contribute ^.*

[BigTrex]

This = Good idea

[Zat]

didn't think give us a server for that, and it was never used? maby it was marked private, idk, but i know that noone was ever on it so if we make a server for regular maps, people would need to actuly use it

[InTeRpOl]

the server think had was a cal server so you couldnt have any skins on your guns so half of the people couldnt even join the server

[Tretnine]

Zat, on Jun 4 2007, 12:36 AM, said:

didn't think give us a server for that, and it was never used? maby it was marked private, idk, but i know that noone was ever on it so if we make a server for regular maps, people would need to actuly use it

The one we currently have is labeled as a private server in the steam listing. Also, as far as maps go, I'd love to have a dust/dust2/office/prodigy/cbble type rotation.

[Jack]

UK & US4 are assorted maps.

They may say "Private" but they are public servers and if you play people will come.

[Tretnine]

Jack, on Jun 4 2007, 11:29 AM, said:

UK & US4 are assorted maps.

They may say "Private" but they are public servers and if you play people will come.

If they're public, can't we get a change in the nomenclature? They can still be locked when needed, but I want people to feel welcome. I'd like it if people were there when I wanted to play, like on breakfloor servers, not just if I get some people together and decide to wait around for a while for a game to develop.

[jaZ]

i sixth it!
so whos payin for it? unless you follow through will killing uk1 or 2 or us1 or 2, which i wouldnt really care about since im a point guy not a rank guy

[Tretnine]

jaZ, on Jun 4 2007, 06:46 PM, said:

i sixth it!
so whos payin for it? unless you follow through will killing uk1 or 2 or us1 or 2, which i wouldnt really care about since im a point guy not a rank guy

Holy crap, it's JaZ?! Anyway, I think we could use 1 or 2 or just rename 4. It doesn't really matter to me. I'd be happier to have one regular map rotation server than 2 breakfloor servers.

[Night Hawk]

Quote

I suggest changing UK2 to regular map cycle. Especially since it will condense the breakfloor population into UK1, so it will be a more full server usually.

sont go there i lag like a beatch if more than 9 ppl on bf

also i use uk 4 a lot with ppl on it

[Crosshair]

jaZ, on Jun 4 2007, 06:46 PM, said:

i sixth it!
so whos payin for it? unless you follow through will killing uk1 or 2 or us1 or 2, which i wouldnt really care about since im a point guy not a rank guy

I think we should convert a US server being as (I believe) a majority of people posting in this thread are from US squads. The whole ordeal would be for naught if it was a UK server.

I suggest taking US 4 and putting on a name like "[WF] Server Dust2/Office/Italy [XX tick]" or whatever maps you want.

[Pk is 1337]

Crosshair, on Jun 8 2007, 01:02 PM, said:

I think we should convert a US server being as (I believe) a majority of people posting in this thread are from US squads. The whole ordeal would be for naught if it was a UK server.

I suggest taking US 4 and putting on a name like "[WF] Server Dust2/Office/Italy [XX tick]" or whatever maps you want.

no because US4 is private server and used for us based scrims.

[Tretnine]

pk is 1337, on Jun 8 2007, 05:27 PM, said:

no because US4 is private server and used for us based scrims.

Why not close the server when you want to use it? as of right now I rarely see people in it, and supposedly it is a public server, whatever the name is.

[Zat]

i dislike the idea of converting an existing server, if we got a new one, i;m all for it. i like those fun little 2v2 games it starts getting annoying with more than 8 people on a server

[Shooter]

7th? or 8th?

[PiskeRiset]

Shooter, on Jun 13 2007, 04:23 PM, said:

7th? or 8th?

OMG stop spamming..

Why have another server when we have UK/US 4 ?

[hnQ]

if this is gonna happen assault is always welcome and I enjoy this idea